ORIGIN and Anduril demonstrate BLAZE interceptor working through Lattice for Latvian military leaders

TLDR

• ORIGIN and Anduril demonstrated BLAZE working through Lattice to senior Latvian military leaders at the end of October.¹
• Resilience Media reports a live intercept of a training target drone, with a human operator in the loop.²
• ORIGIN's commercial director told Resilience Media no procurement commitments have been made.²

ORIGIN, a Latvian company building autonomous unmanned aircraft, and Anduril said in a 5 November release that they demonstrated a joint capability to senior Latvian military leadership at a military training facility in Latvia at the end of October.¹ EDR Magazine reports that BLAZE, ORIGIN's autonomous counter-drone interceptor, acted as the effector of an integrated air defence solution through Anduril's Lattice command-and-control platform, alongside a radar already deployed for Latvian air defence.¹ The demonstration followed a memorandum of understanding signed on 25 September to explore integrating BLAZE with Lattice.¹

Resilience Media adds detail from ORIGIN commercial director Mārtiņš Marenis: a ground-based radar detected the target, Lattice passed the track to BLAZE, and the interceptor engaged the drone in the air with a human operator in the loop throughout.² He said the test took place in normal daytime conditions against a standard military training target drone with a wingspan of about 2 metres.² Anduril Europe vice president Brian Moran said the technical integration took four days, ending in a live engagement that linked the radar, Lattice and BLAZE.¹²

The companies say they will continue joint testing and validation on NATO's eastern flank, along with concept of operations development for counter-UAS missions.¹ Resilience Media notes that Latvia's interest in counter-drone capability follows May incidents in which several drones entered its airspace from Russia, with two coming down in the country and one crashing into an oil storage facility.² Both accounts rest on statements from the two companies, and neither gives an engagement range, altitude, number of engagements or radar model.¹²

Why it matters: the demonstration shows an interceptor tied into a shared command layer on NATO's eastern flank, but it was a daytime engagement against a training target with no procurement commitment made.²